a note

I wonder What is female identity -  can it be formed free from the clutches of the traditional 

feminine or must it be forever linked in opposition to that which is defined for us?

Must women be distinguished by cultural definers of femininity or is it possible to

present an organic female identity?

The term 'garconne' is used to describe the tomboyish flappers of the 1920s; a new category of Western women who transgressed from the traditional feminine by cutting away their long locks for contemporary bobs, liberating themselves from the apparel of proper ladies, and by disobeying the behaviours made necessary by gender norms. They were revolutionists in their own right by means of a newly crafted feminine identity which enabled them to participate in a world refused to them by 

gendered constructions of culture. 

It is interesting, yes, to consider that the opposite of feminine is always masculine - that in rebellion of 

the former a woman is liberated not freely as herself but through the characteristics of a man. 

Dressing themselves in the comfortable collegiate styles of their fathers and brothers, female students of the 1940s found freedom in a considerably masculine academia; these women became tomboys.

Educated career women used the power suit of the 1990s as a tool for success in the public realm 

where taking on masculine traits provided them a way to access professional legitimacy.

Where women have used men's clothing and characteristics to help them move forward in a considerably limited public forum in the past, fashion has provided a means for liberation while also presenting a challenge to the concept of gender construction as a whole.

I began to crave a place in which to develop a curated review of my personal thoughts regarding the coming together of feminism, femininity and identity. Inspired by women of all generations, characters and accomplishments I invite you to join me in an observation and celebration of identity.

xx